Once an employer has recorded a case involving days away from work, restricted work or medical treatment and the employee has returned to his regular work or has received the course of recommended medical treatment, is it permissible for the employer to

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: Once an employer has recorded a case involving days away from work, restricted work or medical treatment and the employee has returned to his regular work or has received the course of recommended medical treatment, is it permissible for the employer to

Answer:

The employer must make an initial decision about the need for days away from work, a work restriction, or medical treatment based on the information available, including any recommendation by a physician or other licensed health care professional. Where the employer receives contemporaneous recommendations from two or more physicians or other licensed health care professionals about the need for days away, a work restriction, or medical treatment, the employer may decide which recommendation is the most authoritative and record the case based on that recommendation. Once the days away from work or work restriction have occurred or medical treatment has been given, however, the employer may not delete the Log entry because of a physician's recommendation, based on a year-end review of the Log, that the days away, restriction or treatment were unnecessary.

For more information, explore OSHA's Recordkeeping Requirements.

An employee hurts his or her left arm and is told by the doctor not to use the left arm for one week. The employee is able to perform all of his or her routine job functions using only the right arm (though at a slower pace and the employee is never requ

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: An employee hurts his or her left arm and is told by the doctor not to use the left arm for one week. The employee is able to perform all of his or her routine job functions using only the right arm (though at a slower pace and the employee is never requ

Answer:

No. If the employee is able to perform all of his or her routine job functions (activities the employee regularly performs at least once per week), the case does not involve restricted work. Loss of productivity is not considered restricted work.

For more information, explore OSHA's Recordkeeping Requirements.

Salini-Impregilo/Healy Joint Venture: Grant of Permanent Variance

  • Publication Date:
  • Publication Type:
  • Fed Register #:
    85:27767-27775
  • Title:
    Salini-Impregilo/Healy Joint Venture: Grant of Permanent Variance
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 91 (Monday, May 11, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27767-27775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No.

Salini-Impregilo/Healy Joint Venture; Application for Permanent Variance and Interim Order; Grant of Interim Order; Request for Comments

  • Publication Date:
  • Publication Type:
  • Fed Register #:
    84:44932-44942
  • Title:
    Salini-Impregilo/Healy Joint Venture; Application for Permanent Variance and Interim Order; Grant of Interim Order; Request for Comments
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 27, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44932-44942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18377]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No.

Jardon and Howard Technologies, Incorporated; Grant of a Permanent Variance

  • Publication Date:
  • Publication Type:
  • Fed Register #:
    84:21822-21832
  • Title:
    Jardon and Howard Technologies, Incorporated; Grant of a Permanent Variance
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 15, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21822-21832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No.

Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses

  • Publication Date:
  • Publication Type:
  • Fed Register #:
    84:380-406
  • Title:
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 17 (Friday, January 25, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 380-406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00101]




Vol. 84

Friday,

No.

Prescription medications, such as an Epi-Pen considered medical treatment beyond first-aid.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

September 13, 2018

Rock Zierman
California Independent Petroleum Association
1001 K Street, Sixth Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Mr. Zierman: