Restricted work definitions.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

February 11, 1994

David J. McGuan
Safety Engineering Supervisor
Champion International Corporation
River Road
Post Office Box 1200
Bucksport, Maine 04416

Dear Mr. McGuan:

Thank you for your letter dated November 29, 1993, requesting interpretations for several OSHA injury and illness recordkeeping issues. Your letter was forwarded to this office by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on January 13. My Division of Recordkeeping Requirements is responsible for the maintenance of the injury and illness recordkeeping system nationwide.

Determining if an injury is considered a new recordkeeping case based on a recurrence of previously recorded symptoms.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

December 21, 2005

Mr. Dave Beyer
Lucas Milhaupt, Inc.
5656 S. Pennsylvania Ave.
Cudahy, WI 53110-0638

Dear Mr. Beyer:

We have recently received your letter dated May 9, 2005 regarding the OSHA Injury and Illness Recordkeeping regulation, 29 CFR Part 1904, and its application to the OSHA 300 log.

Recordkeeping requirements for injury cases which result in treatment with prescription medications.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

August 30, 1991

Ms. Linda Balas
Environmental Management and Training Systems, Inc.
4413 Copper Creek Lane
Toledo, Ohio 43615

Dear Linda:

Thank you for your letter of July 29 requesting clarification of the OSHA injury and illness recordkeeping requirements for injury cases which result in treatment with prescription medications.

Recording TB related cases on the OSHA 200 Log.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

February 15, 1994

MEMORANDUM FOR:     REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS

ATTENTION:          REGIONAL RECORDKEEPING COORDINATORS

THRU:               LEO CAREY
                   Director
                   Office of Field Programs

FROM:               BOB WHITMORE
                   Chief, Division of Recordkeeping Requirements
                   Office of Statistics

SUBJECT:            Recording TB related cases on the OSHA 200 Log

Work Relationship

Clarification of occupational illness for OSHA 200 log.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

March 24, 1994

Mr. Michael D. Zoll, CSP
Manager of Safety
Alcan Aluminum Corporation
100 Erieview
Post Office Box 6977
Cleveland, Ohio 44101-1977

Dear Mr. Zoll:

Thank you for your letter dated February 8, requesting guidance on the proper recording of illnesses on the OSHA 200 Log. Your letter was forwarded to my office from the Directorate of Compliance Programs. The Division of Recordkeeping Requirements is responsible for the administration of the injury and illness recordkeeping system nationwide.

Parking facilities are not considered part of an employer's premises for OSHA recordkeeping purposes.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

March 24, 1994

Paul C. Decker, CSP
Ciba-Geigy Corporation
Post Office Box 100
Suffern, New York 10901-0100

Dear Mr. Decker:

Thank you for your letter dated February 25, outlining your understanding of OSHA recordkeeping requirements in regards to injuries and illnesses which occur in company parking lots. I feel that the requirements as outlined in your letter need further clarification. In my response I will refer to the Recordkeeping Guidelines for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses by citing the appropriate page and Q&A numbers.

Ergonomic problems and recordkeeping issues.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

April 8, 1994

Mr. Brad Brown
Planning & Research Associate II
Department of Labor
Bureau of Labor Standards
Research & Statistics Division
State House Station #45
Augusta, Maine 04333-0045

Dear Brad:

Recording hearing loss on the OSHA 200 log.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

April 8, 1994

Mr. Stanley Burdman
Safety and Training
New York Shipping Association. Inc.
2 World Trade Center
New York, New York 10048-0075

Dear Mr. Burdman:

Thank you for your letter dated January 7, requesting clarification on the proper recording of hearing loss cases on the OSHA 200 log. You letter was forwarded to the OSHA Office of Statistics by the New York Regional Office. The Division of Recordkeeping Requirements is responsible for the maintenance of the injury and illness recordkeeping system nationwide.

Retest of audiogram for hearing loss.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

April 8, 1994

Ms. Mary McDaniel, M.S., CCC-A
V.P. - Coordinator of Services
Washington Audiology Services, Inc.
6987 Perimeter Road South
Suite 100
Seattle, Washington 98108-3840

Dear Ms. McDaniel:

Employer exemptions to the recordkeeping requirements.

Archive Notice - OSHA Archive

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at https://www.osha.gov.

May 3, 1994