Powered by GoogleTranslate

Violation Detail

Standard Cited: 19100217 C01 I Mechanical power presses.

Inspection Nr: 1117773.015

Citation: 03001

Citation Type: Repeat

Abatement Status: Abatement Completed

Initial Penalty: $15,400.00

Current Penalty: $9,000.00

Issuance Date: 06/29/2016

Nr Instances: 14

Nr Exposed: 6

Abatement Date: 08/04/2016

Gravity: 10

Report ID: 0522500

Contest Date: 07/21/2016

Final Order: 03/16/2018

Related Event Code (REC): R

Emphasis:


Penalty and Failure to Abate Event History
Type Latest Event Event Date Penalty Abatement Due Date Citation Type Failure to Abate Inspection
Penalty F: Formal Settlement 03/16/2018 $9,000.00 08/04/2016 Repeat  
Penalty C: Contested 07/28/2016 $15,400.00 08/04/2016 Repeat  
Penalty Z: Issued 06/29/2016 $15,400.00 08/04/2016 Repeat  

Text For Citation: 03 Item/Group: 001 Hazard:

29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to provide and insure the usage of "point of operation guards" or properly applied and adjusted point of operation devices on every operation performed on a mechanical power press. See Table O-10: On or about May 5, 2016, the employer failed to provide properly applied ?point of operation guards? in that presence sensing point of operation devices (light curtains) were not properly applied, due to the single channel wiring of the devices into the ?dedicated safety relay,? integration of the light curtain installation through the ?e-stop? circuit and locating the reset function of the control box, in the area protected by the device or ?behind? the light curtain beam. The following mechanical power presses light curtain point of operation guards were improperly applied and installed on the following mechanical power presses: a. A-1 transfer press: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay? and the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit. b. A-2 transfer press: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay? and the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit. c. A-6 transfer press: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay? and the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit. d. K-2 progressive press: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay,? the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit and the light curtain reset function was located ?behind? the detection zone of the light curtain beam. e. K-9 blanking press: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay? and the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit. f. K-10 blanking press: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay? and the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit. g. RY-1 line, press 1: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay,? the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit and the light curtain reset function was located ?behind? the detection zone of the light curtain beam. h. RY-2 line, press 1: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay,? the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit and the light curtain reset function was located ?behind? the detection zone of the light curtain beam. i. RY-2 line, press 2: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay,? the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit and the light curtain reset function was located ?behind? the detection zone of the light curtain beam. j. RY-2 line, press 3: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay,? the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit and the light curtain reset function was located ?behind? the detection zone of the light curtain beam. k. RY-2 line, press 4: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay,? the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit and the light curtain reset function was located ?behind? the detection zone of the light curtain beam. l. RY-4 line, press 1: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay,? the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit and the light curtain reset function was located ?behind? the detection zone of the light curtain beam. m. RY-4 line, press 4: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay,? the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit and the light curtain reset function was located ?behind? the detection zone of the light curtain beam. n. RY-4 line, press 8: the light curtain had single channel wiring into the ?dedicated safety relay,? the installation was integrated into the ?e-stop? circuit and the light curtain reset function was located ?behind? the detection zone of the light curtain beam. Sunfield, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 977633, citation number 1 item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on August 27, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 116 Enterprise Drive, Hebron, Ohio 43025.

Thank You for Visiting Our Website

You are exiting the Department of Labor's Web server.

The Department of Labor does not endorse, takes no responsibility for, and exercises no control over the linked organization or its views, or contents, nor does it vouch for the accuracy or accessibility of the information contained on the destination server. The Department of Labor also cannot authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites. Users must request such authorization from the sponsor of the linked Web site. Thank you for visiting our site. Please click the button below to continue.

Close