Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 007 Hazard: REFINERY

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(6): The employer did not ensure after the initial process haz ard analysis that the process hazard analysis was updated and revalidated at lea st every five (5) years by a team meeting the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.119(e) (4): a.BP-Husky Refining, LLC - Oregon, Ohio: On or about September 10, 2009, th e employer did not ensure a layer of protection analysis (LOPA) was performed as part of the company's process hazard analysis (PHA) revalidation of the FCC unit require d by the company's PHA guidelines. The PHA for the FCC was conducted in April 20 08, but as of September 10, 2009, the LOPA had not been performed to determine i f hazards identified in the PHA resulted in recommendations requiring action. b. BP-Husky Refining, LLC - Oregon, Ohio: On or about September 10, 2009, the emplo yer did not ensure corporate generic hazard scenarios which may result in a SIL 1 or lower safety instrumented system (SIS), were evaluated for a large number o f process units. The company received the hazard scenerios in March 2009 and did not have plans on evaluating the hazard scenarios until May 2015. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, docum entation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence o f the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of aba tement, or other written records.