Text For Citation: 01 Item/Group: 006 Hazard: REFINERY

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(vi): The process hazard analysis did not address human fac tors: a.BP-Husky Refining, LLC - Oregon, Ohio: On or about September 10, 2009, t he employer's 2006 Alky 1 PHA claim human actions as safeguards and did not addr ess human factors, such as, but not limited to, an operator's inability to manua lly drain water from the reactor when a slug of water in the Butylene feed coale scer could cause carryover of water into the reactor which could result in acid runaway, or freez ing and rupture of the line. b.BP-Husky Refining, LLC - Oregon, Ohio: On or abou t September 10, 2009, the employer's 2006 Alky 1 PHA claim human actions as safe guards and did not address human factors, such as, but not limited to, an operat or's inability to operate the Alky 1 Iso Recycle in manual mode which could resu lt in flow being cut to processes in Alky 2 or 3 and lead to a major process ups et. c.BP-Husky Refining, LLC - Oregon, Ohio: On or about September 10, 2009, the employer's 2006 Alky 1 PHA claim human actions as safeguards and did not addres s human factors, such as, but not limited to, an operator's inability to follow training and/or procedures to supply condensate to the first stage reactor which could result in process upset. d.BP-Husky Refining, LLC - Oregon, Ohio: On or about September 10 , 2009, the employer's 2006 Alky 1 PHA claim human actions as safeguards and did not address human factors, such as, but not limited to, an operator's inability to close the block valve in the reflux line which could result in the over-pres surization of the debutanizer tower. e.BP-Husky Refining, LLC - Oregon, Ohio: On or about September 10, 2009, the employer did not ensure the 2008 FCC PHA consi dered human factors, in that, an isolation valve in the blower discharge line ma y require more than one operator to close it during an emergency shutdown. f.BP- Husky Refining, LLC - Oregon, Ohio: On or about September 10, 2009, the employer did not ensure the Alky 1 PHA considered the ability of employees to respond to acid releases in inclement and cold weather while wearing level A protective suits and SCBAs. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification i s required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORK SHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photograph ic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.t,